Dear Experts,
Need your assistance. Recently we have shifted from EHP5 to EHP7. On quality portal everything is working fine but on production its giving error on every tab like in ESS ( Working Time, etc).
Screen shot attached for reference.
Regards
Jazib Tariq
We're implementing the Payroll Control Center FP3. Is it possible to run off cycle payroll using this? Currently, we do not see an option for users to input the off cycle payroll period and off cycle reason while running payroll using PCC.
Hi Expert ,
We have one client they have some issue regarding the payslip as follows:
1. Client want the worker Paid days Should be 26 or 27 days.
2. Worker do not have weekly off, So it should be zero.
I don't have much idea about the PCR but i think it can be achieved with the help of PCR only.so kindly guide me
Weekly off PCR for worker:
ZOPY payslip configuration for weekly offs
*
****
NUM=GKSOLL Set
NUM-GASOLL Subtraction
ADDWT&123 VAR Variable table
ADDWTE/03A RT Results table.
Paid days PCR for worker:
ZOPE worker paid days
*
****
NUM=GASOLL Set
NUM-GAAU** Subtraction
ADDWTE/07A RT Results table
Unpaid absences for worker:
ZOPT payslip configuration for weekly offs
*
****
NUM=GAAU** Set
ADDWTE/06A RT Results table
Please guide me what changes i can do in the PCR to achieve the client requirement.
Regards
Ravi Manekar.
Hi Experts,
I have an issue relating to section 80(D) Mediclaim exemption.
Emp is contributing Mediclaim premium through IT0057 using a single WT 5MED.
This premium of deduction may include Self, Self Senior, Parents, Parents Senior.
In IT 0021 sub types( 0, 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7 ) we have provided custom filed " Mediclaim"
in order to know the Emp's nominations who are all coming under Mediclaim premium contribution.
To get the Mediclaim exemption under Section 80(D), we need to map four (4) WTs
in V_T7INIC under the sub section 2, Division 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively for the exemption of
1. Mediclaim Insr Premium ( Non_Senior Citizen ) - 25,000/-
2. Mediclaim Insr Premium ( Senior Citizen ) -30,000/-
3. Mediclaim Insr Premium ( Parents ) - 25,000/-
4. mediclaim Insr Premium ( Senior Parent ) - 30,000/-
As per SAP standard, for each division ( 1, 2,3 and 4 ) there should be a separate wage type needed, to get the correct exemption.
But the problem is,here I have a single WT called 5MED only.
a) If I assign the 5MED wage type for all the above mentioned line items,
system gives exemption of 60,000/- or Emp's yearly premium whichever is less.
b) If I assign 5MED wage type to any of the one line item from above mentioned list,
System gives only particular exemption, this may also wrong.
Client is not ready to provide separate wage type for each line item. How to divide the 5MED WT as four separated WTs to enter in V_T7INIC.
or is there any other way to get the correct exemption?
Request you experts kindly give the inputs to close the issue.
Regards,
Mastan Shaik.
Hi Experts,
I am getting error on MSS for organization and position profile:
The application cannot be started because the person ID is missing
Please can I request you to throw some light - I could so some threads talking about SAP note however we are at latest package and we have all the corrections in place.
Need Urgent help
Regards
Hi,
We're working on the WDA CATS, and on some scenarios we get dumps in this class
CL_XSS_CAT_TABLE->SET_TABLE due to use of uninitialized reference.
The flow below is like that:
READ TABLE row_table INTO l_current_row INDEX sy-tabix.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
IF NOT IS INITIAL.
l_current_row = create_empty_row( ).
ELSE.
CONTINUE.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
IF l_current_row->set_ui_row( im_line =) = 'X'.
changed = 'X'.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
but the method CREATE_EMPTY_ROW has no line of code inside, so it does not initialize l_current_row, and when it's used it dumps
can you tell me if it's the same in your systems? or am i missing some part of that class
Hi all,
I need to update PA2001 and therby update pa30 while approving the leave request. I can apply the leave request in fiori and the approver can approver the request. The leave shows approved in front end fiori my leave request app so that my customised workflow is working but its not updating the backend . Please help
Hello experts,
How would i go about creating a banked overtime quota that caps at 40 hours a year regardless of how much of it gets used.
Ex.: An employee banks 40 hours in overtime. He then uses 8 hours of it. Even though he has 32 hours remaining on his banked overtime, he should not be able to bank more since he has already reached the 40 hours maximum threshold.
Is this possible? if so, then how can it be handled in SAP?
Thanks in advance,
C
Hello Friends,
Currently we are in ECC 6 EHP7, while we do termination action default position "99999999" not getting populated automatically. It shows with existing position which employee was holding and status shows as Withdrawn.
Following are checked in t77s0
PLOGI PERLI - 99999999
PLOGI ORGA - X
PLOGIPLOGI - 01
Checked T529A and MSN20 maintained in action
I dont know what else we are missing to get it defaulted.
Thanks
Srikanth
Hi all
The scenario that we are facing is to enable employee to work from their home with positive time evaluation;.in addiction, in some particular days the company wants the employee to be at work "on site" instead of "at home".
In order to let it work we develop a remote "time Stamp Terminal" that capture the clock in and clock out of the employee via web, but we need to define a presence that signal to employee that in that particular day he/she is attended at company site, instead of working at home.This presence should be a sort of "placeholder", with the only goal of make evidence to employee (via ESS) of the day in which he/she is expected to be "on site"
I am wondering if there is any possibility to define a presence that would act as a placeholder, i.e. that is irrelevant for signal the presence of employee (function VARSTPRSNT); in this way I don't have to modify at all the time management cycle, and (as usual) throw error only if the employee doesn't clock in and clock out, or insert any other absences for that particular day..
I have already tried to set to 0% the calculation rule (T556C) assigned to the presence, but it seems that is relevant only for Time Quota evaluation.
Thanks in advance
Paolo
Dear Friends,
We are using IT Declaration approval application for india HRESS_ITDL_AP_IN through an iview. All config fine, even approval is happening through SE80->Webdynpro application. But when checking the same through portal it gives an error "FPM application HRESS_ITDL_AP_IN was started without configuration".
Followed link :IT Declartion Application Error | SCN
But we are not using this app under LPD_CUST ,if we do this this application will appear for all employees .
This application /role is assigned only to the Finance Admin.
Regards,
Niladri
Hi Experts,
We are trying to change the time constraint of IT 219 from "T" to "2"( I know changing TC is not advisable but the requirement is such).
Below are the customizing changes that we made as per the requirement.
We changed the time constraint from T to 2( in the infotype properties) and deleted the time constraint table value with sub type obligatory checked for IT 219.
And then when I created two records of IT 0219 for an employee from PA30, both of them had end date as 31.12.9999. It overlapped which shouldn’t have happened for time constraint 2, the old record should have been delimited.
What am I missing here ?
Many thanks in advance.
Saikat
Hi Fellow Members,
I hope you will be able to help with an issue I am having with authorisation for PTMW.
We have set up managers to be able to maintain certain Absence/Attendance types for their employees in PTMW and also run the Start Time Evaluation functionality.
Initially managers were able to see to see the attendance/absence type but did not have authorisation to run the Start Time Evaluation functionality see screenshot below.
I ran SU53 and made the required changes and the manager is now able to run Start Time Evaluation functionality however they now cannot see the attendance/absence type, see screenshot below.
I have ran SU53 a number of times making the required changes without joy. I am reluctant to keep making changes in case it impacts any functionality that is currently working.
As anyone else had similar issues and be able to share how they resolved it.
Many thanks for your help.
Ian
Dear Experts,
What is standard functionality available for Check printing for Off cycle payroll in SAP and its accountability.
Like company gives from cheque no. 100 to 199 to a person and this should be accountable how these cheques were used and for when and what purpose which also includes cancellation/ reissue for different reasons.
Need your advise.
Hi all,
I have the following situation.
The employees has to submit attendance hours over WBS elements (with attendance type 0001) OR absence hours over a generic absence type (0300) with no accounting objects.
I have implemented the data entry profile with 2 columns: WBS and Absence\att type.
The problem is that in this way the user can submit hours on WBS and at the same write 0300 (absence) or submits hours as attendance and not specify any WBS, and this is an issue.
how is possible to implement a control that allows the user to submit attendance hours only on WBS and absence hours leaving the value blank?
Hi,
My client is using AFY i.e. they consider FY from March to February for Income tax calculation. My question is if we can Go-Live mid year with AFY solution?
Thanks.
Hi all,
is there any way to read Terminal ID from PA2011 infotype in Time management schema, or I must write an ABAP function?
Thansk in advance
Paolo
Hi All,
In our payroll system, I am noticing the wage split indicator V0 is incremented for each wage type with value 01 though we have change with the current processing wage type.
My expectation is to initialize the counter to 01 when we have a new wage type from Input table. I tried to call the SETIN operation in a separate rule but still no luck.
if you have any idea on this issue, Please share your thoughts.
Regards
Ranjit.
Hi All,
One of the user have an issue in applying leave via ESS..
Error:
Conflict with Absences / Annual Leave (IT2001/1001) from 02.01.2015 to 05.01.2015.
What could be the possible reason for this error.
Can please give inputs.
Thank you.
Anitha
Issue 1:
Manager is coming as Blank when Key date 10 October 2015 is entered.
However Manager is visible in PPOSE for the same employee for that period.
As seen in the screen shot below:
Issue 2:
Addition of other employee in the input parameter in same query for Key date 10/01/2015 results in returning
Manager of this additional input for both the employees, which is incorrect.
However in PPOSE its different.
As seen in the screen shot below.
